Entrez en contact avec Masstech
Machine de remplissage de vin : 2 500 Bouteille en verre B 15 000 B pour vins, technologie de masse
Goulot d'étranglement des producteurs de vin et solution de remplissage de masse
Une machine de remplissage de vin appelée aussi remplisseur de bouteilles de vin dans les petites configurations commerciales, ou équipement complet d'embouteillage de vin à l'échelle industrielle automatise le cycle rinçage-remplissage-bouchon pour le vin en bouteille de verre, remplaçant le remplissage manuel qui crée des contraintes de goulot d'étranglement une fois que la capacité de production d'une cave dépasse quelques milliers de cas par an Les causes profondes apparaissent de trois façons mesurables bien avant que la plupart des propriétaires ne réalisent qu'ils ont un problème d'embouteillage.
Plafond de débit
Les charges gravitaires plafonnées à environ 250 HBP et à deux mains Une cave de cinq mille cas par an utilisant du matériel manuel manque plus de 20 jours de travail chaque année d'embouteillage.
Remplir la conformité
Les remplissages erratiques provoquent des violations des règles TTB75-85-95 et des problèmes de conformité au volume de l'UE. Les vins remplis à la main varient en moyenne de 3 à 5 ml, tandis que les remplisseurs de pression de pointe maintiennent 1 ml.
Perte d'oxydation
La mise en bouteille en plein air entraîne un excès d'oxygène total dans l'emballage (TPO).Des études montrent que même les processus de décoloration-filtration introduisent 0,10 ppm d'oxygène dissous supplémentaire, ce qui entraîne en masse une réduction très réelle de la durée de conservation.
Ces problèmes renvoient tous à des causes profondes que même un monobloc d'entrée de gamme rencontrera à 1 000 BPH. La capacité de mise en bouteille dépend du nombre de têtes de remplissage et du contrôle de la pression, et pas seulement de la puissance du moteur. La précision du remplissage est dictée par la façon dont les vannes de remplissage sont conçues et par la façon dont vous pouvez nettoyer leurs pièces mouillées.
La série MSGF de technologie de masse comble cette lacune avec une échelle de capacité à cinq niveaux, depuis un système de 2 500 bouteilles par heure adapté aux petits établissements vinicoles jusqu'à une ligne de production industrielle de 15 000 BPH Chaque modèle combine rinceur, remplisseur et bouchon sur un seul châssis contrôlé par PLC, avec des surfaces mouillées AISI 304 et un remplissage par gravité ou micro-pression négative sélectionnable Les prix tombent 40-601TP3 T en dessous des pairs premium italiens, tandis que les normes de construction répondent aux exigences CE et ISO 9001 :2015.
“La plus grosse erreur que nous avons vu les établissements vinicoles novices en embouteillage faire, est d'acheter une machine à remplissage uniquement, prévoyant d'ajouter un rinceur à l'avenir Avant qu'ils ne le sachent ils dépensent plus que ce que le monobloc intégré coûterait, et ont gaspillé l'espace nécessaire pour l'ajouter plus tard.” La famille de systèmes MSGF a été conçue de sorte que même le modèle d'entrée était capable de compléter un envoi de cas fini.
Machines de remplissage de vin de la série MSGF Cinq modèles de 2 500 à 15 000 BPH
Mass Technology fournit une famille de cinq modèles de remplissage de vin MSGF, spécialement conçus pour des niveaux de production annuels spécifiques Le nombre de têtes de remplissage (et donc le coût/capacité) augmente en fonction de la production Toutes les versions utilisent des sous-systèmes communs (rinceur, capper, contrôleur PLC) pour la courbe d'apprentissage rapide des travailleurs et la facilité de gestion des pièces de rechange Les choix d'ingénierie dépendent de l'endroit où les acheteurs évoluent réellement : 3 000 producteurs artisanaux, 10 000 caves-boutiques, 30 000 marques de niveau intermédiaire et 100 000 embouteilleurs industriels.
| Modèle | HBP (330 ml) | Têtes (Rinse-Fill-Cap) | Puissance totale | Empreinte (mm) | Poids | Meilleur ajustement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSGF 14-12-5 | 2,500-3,000 | 14 / 12 / 5 | 2,75 kW | 2700×1500×2300 | 2 800 kg | Cave artisanale (cas 3-5K) |
| MSGF 18-18-6 | 4,500-5,000 | 18 / 18 / 6 | 3,18 kW | 3012×2012×3260 | 3 800 kg | Boutique (boîtiers 8-15K) |
| MSGF 24-24-8 | 8,000-9,000 | 24 / 24 / 8 | 4,18 kW | 3280×2420×3200 | 5 000 kg | Mi-échelle (25-50 K cas) |
| MSGF 32-32-8 | 12,000-13,000 | 32 / 32 / 8 | 7,68 kW | 4430×2800×3200 | 6 800 kg | Embouteilleur régional (60-120 K caisses) |
| MSGF 40-40-10 | 14,000-15,000 | 40 / 40 / 10 | 7,68 kW | 4650×3200×3200 | 8 800 kg | Industriel (plus de 150 000 caisses) |
Spécifications partagées Tous les modèles MSGF
Gamme de bouteilles
Hauteur 160-340 mm, Diamètre 50-100 mm, y compris la plupart des Bordeaux, Bourgogne, Hock, scintillant et de nombreuses formes de bouteilles fortifiées.
Méthodes de remplissage
Pression micro négative (vide) : ou remplissage par gravité ; programmable par lots via le PLC.
Plage de remplissage et température
Plage de remplissage : 0.15-0.5 Mpa réglable Plage de température de remplissage : 0-30 C en standard, personnalisé pour les applications de remplissage à chaud.
Pression de l'eau et matériaux
Water pressure (rinser): 0.25-0.3Mpa. Wetted materials: AISI 304 steel (AISI 316 optional with fruit wines of high acid.)
Decision Logic
Select a system where your peaks-month (cases 12 peak-month-load) bottling is 60-70% of the system’s hourly throughput. Bottling at 100% BPH per shift all day all night all year wears equipment out faster; shoot for headroom provision, the least-expensive insurance when buying capital equipment. For growers living on 5,000 cases per year, planning for 30,000 cases by year 5, the MSGF 18-18-6 with cap-changeover module tends to outperform “grow” later.
Need help matching your annual volume to a model?
Use the BPH CalculatorFilling Method Decision Matrix — Gravity vs Vacuum vs Isobaric for Your Wine
Choosing the wrong fill method always costs more than choosing the wrong filler. A gravity filler running Champagne loses CO within seconds. An isobaric system on a still red burns pressurization energy and risks foaming bottles. Four commercial wine bottling methods each align to suitable wine chemistry and package goal.
Gravity Filling
Wine flows from header tank into bottle by gravity, using a vent tube to relay displacing air. Optimum for still wines (reds, whites, blush wines) with moderate oxygen tolerance and capital constrained. Lowest equipment cost, easiest maintenance, most compatible brand-tier.
Micro Negative Pressure (Vacuum) Filling
The empty bottle is pulled to a slight vacuum before being filled by displaced air, removing most of the oxygen-rich headspace. Oxidation pickup is 60-80% lower (as seen by a lower TPO) than gravity filling. The MSGF series defaults to this on premium still wines and oxidation-sensitive whites.
Isobaric Filling
Bottle and filler tank are vented to each other at the same pressure (commonly 1-3 bar), keeping CO dissolved in wine during the fill. Mandatory for Champagnes, sparklers, proseccos. Higher equipment capital cost not an option for carbonated products—gravity fill makes prosecco flat as a pancake in the bottle.
AOX (Light Pressure with Inert Gas)
A compromise: low-pressure(<0.5 bar) fill with nitrogen or argon sparge into the headspace. Typical of Italian premium lines such as Bertolaso. Mass MSGF series can be configured with AOX add-on for customers with very high TPO goals.
| Wine Type | Gravité | Aspirateur | Isobare | AOX | Meilleur ajustement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Still red / white (mid-tier) | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | Gravity (cost-best) |
| Premium still (oxidation-sensitive) | — | ✓✓ | — | ✓✓ | Vacuum or AOX |
| Sparkling / champagne | — | — | ✓✓ | — | Isobaric mandatory |
| Prosecco / pet-nat | — | — | ✓✓ | — | Isobare |
| Fortified (Port, Sherry) | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | Vacuum (low alcohol-O₂ rxn) |
| Fruit wine (low pH) | ✓ | ✓✓ | — | ✓ | Vacuum (oxidation-prone) |
| Rice / yellow wine | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | Gravity or vacuum |
Why TPO matters more than fill speed
Plenty of industry research documents that the average 2 years’ cellar age premium wine and a 5-year cellar age premium wine are oftastwo years apart in whatever the bottle exposure at bottling equals, rather than the true cellar aging program. Total Package Oxygen above 1.5 ppm at bottling is industry pink-red flags. The MSGF micro negative-pressure mode targeted below 1.0 ppm TPO while sparged with inert gases.
The filling method is not a fixed parameter: The MSGF series has a mid-batch button so that a winery that produces both still and premium reserva can switch from gravity to vacuum or vice versa in the middle of a batch.
Not sure which method fits your wine portfolio?
Take the Filling Method Recommendation QuizCap Format Selection — Cork, T-Cork, ROPP, Screw Cap: When to Use Which
Caps is marketing cloaking as engineering. Natural cork still conveys “cellar worthy” in the majority of premium wine markets. Screw cap is the resounding choice in Australia and NZ and creeping as a selection in the mid tier US table wine market. Each format brings particular challanges to the capper sector of your monoblock.
Natural Cork
Premium positioning, 5-15 year aging potential, $0.30-1.50 per cap depending on grade. Requires vacuum-corker action: the machine evacuates bottle headspace, compresses the cork, then releases inside the bottle. The MSGF capper handles 24×38 mm corks as standard, with optional jaws for larger formats.
T-Cork (Stopper)
Designed for fortified wines such as Port, Sherry, and Madeira, plus some olive oils. Provides a re-sealable closure with a flanged top for hand removal. Requires screw-cap-style insertion rather than full corker compression — make sure T-cork tooling is included in your monoblock spec if this is on your roadmap.
ROPP (Roll-On Pilfer-Proof)
Aluminum cap rolled onto a threaded bottle neck, with a tear-off lower band for tamper evidence. Standard for spirits and increasingly used for premium screw-cap wine. The MSGF 24-24-8 and larger models support ROPP modules; smaller tiers can add ROPP as a dedicated capper after the filler.
Screw Cap (Stelvin)
Aluminum cap with internal liner (Saranex or Saran-Tin), cost $0.10-0.30 per cap. Mandatory for export to AU and NZ markets and increasingly preferred by mid-tier US producers for shelf consistency. The MSGF capper handles the full Stelvin range (BVS 30×60 standard).
Crown Cap
Used during the secondary fermentation stage of traditional-method sparkling wine, then replaced with cork after disgorgement. If your bottling line will include sparkling, factor crown cap tooling into your initial procurement to avoid expensive retrofitting later.
| Wine + Market Tier | Cork | T-Cork | ROPP | Screw | Crown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premium aged red | ✓✓✓ | — | — | — | — |
| Mid-tier still wine | ✓ | — | — | ✓✓✓ | — |
| Fortified (Port / Sherry) | — | ✓✓✓ | — | — | — |
| Sparkling (final closure) | ✓✓✓ | — | — | — | ✓ (interim) |
| Spirits / fortified high-proof | — | — | ✓✓✓ | — | — |
| Export to AU / NZ | — | — | — | ✓✓✓ | — |
| Daily-drinking value tier | — | — | — | ✓✓✓ | — |
Practical buying advice
Budget for a minimum of two cap formats from day 1 if you scale across more than one wine tier. The cap to cap changeover on MSGF series is 12-18 min if we have the trained operator, so one machine can run cork in the first shift and screw cap in the 2 nd shift, avoiding operator fatigue.
Customer Outcomes — From Manual to 12,000 BPH Across Three Continents
The cleanest approach to predict the bottling-line return is by applying the equipment-budget formula that all of the industry recognizes and to benchmark against substitutes. The benchmark text is taken from wine business monthly’s reviews which have been historically used by equipment-leasing companies.
If we apply to a particular scale, this formula leads to the following budget comparison:
| Annual Cases | Recommended Budget | MSGF Recommendation | Mobile Bottling Alternative (5 yr) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3,000 | $24,000 – $30,000 | MSGF 14-12-5 (entry tier) | $33,000 – $37,500 (mobile) |
| 10,000 | $80,000 – $100,000 | MSGF 18-18-6 standard | $110,000 – $125,000 (mobile) |
| 30,000 | $240,000 – $300,000 | MSGF 24-24-8 with options | $330,000 – $375,000 (mobile) |
| 100,000 | $800,000 – $1,000,000 | MSGF 32-32-8 + auxiliaries | $1,100,000+ (mobile) |
Use of an MSGF line at each tier of the multi-tier system beats the 5-year mobile bottling cost at $2.20-2.50 per case- and is retained as an asset through its MS program. According to the 2025 WineBusiness Monthly equipment survey the industry is approximately evenly split between own-line and mobile bottling, leaving half the addressable market still weighing the same purchase decision.
Case Pattern 1 — South American boutique winery
Starting point: manual hand-filling, then capped at ca 800 cases per year with 3 people on staff. Selected the new MSGF 14-12-5 with vacuum-fill choice for premium reserve labels. After 18 months, scaled production to ca 4,500 cases/year, payback against equipment cost met at month 14 based on added-margin-per-case payback studies.
Case Pattern 2 — Eastern European mid-scale producer
Starting point: 10-year-old used Italian monoblock with 4-6 lost bottling days per quarter for breakdown repair. Installed upgraded models with integrated rinser. Outcome: scaled to 90,000 cases/year, downtime hit by ca 60% based on first-year service manual, freight-recovered installed cost within 26 months.
Case Pattern 3 — Asian fruit-wine producer
Starting point: three manual bottling lines in 3 locations producing mixed SKUs, high cap- changeover-error rate. Consolidated to single line by installing upgraded model with cap-change module to run cork, ROPP, and screw caps. Result: 150,000 cases/year with 4 SKUs, cap-changeover time reduced from ca 90 mins to less than 20 between batches.
Factory Floor & Production Assembly
Certifications & Compliance — CE·ISO 9001:2015·GMP-Aligned·FDA-Compatible Materials
Meeting regulatory enforcement can be dry and annoying until it isn’t. An improperly CE-compliant line can be impounded at any EU port-of-entry. High-PFDA contact-item standards can trigger recall across contiguous US shipments. Mass Technology builds to these standards baseline, never as an upgrade.
Marquage CE
EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC compliance — required for all European installations
ISO 9001:2015
Manufacturing quality management system, audited annually
GMP-Aligned
Hygienic design for food-grade fluid handling: wine, juice, dairy, vinegar
FDA-Compatible
AISI 304/316 contact materials approved for direct food contact
Materials and Hygienic Design Detail
- Wetted surfaces: AISI 304 standard, AISI 316 optional for low-pH fruit wines and acidic fortified products. All welds polished to Ra ≤ 0.8 µm to meet 3-A Sanitary Standards.
- CIP (Clean-in-Place) provisions: built-in sanitizing-injection ports to rinser, filler tank and each filling-valve module. Compatible with NaOH (1-2%) and PAA sanitizing options.
- Rinsing pressure: 0.25-0.30 MPa hot water rinse method standard, acidified-water optional module for difficult residues.
Wine Bottling Line Procurement Guide — Pricing, Lead Time, Landed Cost & After-Sales
Sourcing is where most bottling-line supplier projects run into commonly experienced reality. Price, lead-time and landed-cost appallingly opaque to international procurement teams is the single most common critique among our clients workgroups from overseas. The ranges below are published upfront as a benchmark reference; final quotation depends on configuration and appointment.
| Modèle | FOB Price Range (USD) | Standard Configuration Included |
|---|---|---|
| MSGF 14-12-5 | $42,000 – $58,000 | Base monoblock + cork capping module |
| MSGF 18-18-6 | $58,000 – $75,000 | + automatic infeed conveyor + spare valve set |
| MSGF 24-24-8 | $75,000 – $108,000 | + ROPP module + 1-year spare-parts kit |
| MSGF 32-32-8 | $108,000 – $145,000 | + cap-changeover module + remote-diagnostics package |
| MSGF 40-40-10 | $145,000 – $185,000 | + Industry 4.0 data export + accumulation tables |
Landed Cost Framework — Top Export Markets
On-Landed Cost FOB figures, international clients: ca 60-75% of land-cost equivalentprice (then add freight, duty, install, and operator training). Typical ranges across 16 of our top export markets:
| Composante Coût | Typical Range | Remarques |
|---|---|---|
| Ocean freight (40HQ container) | $3,800 – $8,500 | 1×40HQ fits MSGF 14-24, 2×40HQ for MSGF 32-40 |
| Import duty | 0% – 12% | Varies by country; EU/AU often 0%, US ~3%, some LATAM higher |
| Customs clearance + handling | $800 – $2,500 | Country-specific brokerage |
| On-site installation | $4,000 – $8,000 | Mass engineer travel + 5-10 days on-site |
| Operator training | $1,500 – $4,000 | 3-day program, English or Spanish |
Lead Time and Payment
Standard production lead time is 60-90 days from confirmed order, faster than the 90-120 day window typical of European premium suppliers. Payment terms are 30% deposit on order confirmation, with the 70% balance settled against bill-of-lading copy before vessel departure. Letter-of-credit at sight is supported for buyers requiring bank-mediated payment.
Insight Industrie
One UNEXPECTED discovery from our 2025 buyer interviews: some international wineries that used mobile bottling trucks to service their customers had service-flexibility issues, not capital cost issues, that prevented them from owning a line. The 24-hour SLA and stocked spare-parts approach is designed specifically to eliminate that impediment.
After-Sales SLA
Service commitments — written into every contract
Garantie
2-year all-parts warranty on the full MSGF line, covering filling valves, capping heads, and PLC controls.
Réponse de l'ingénieur
24-hour technical response via email, WhatsApp, or scheduled video call — across all timezones.
Livraison de pièces de rechange
5 working days international courier (DHL / FedEx) for all standard wear parts. Critical-path parts kept in stock at the Zhangjiagang factory.
Operator training
3-day on-site program included with installation, plus annual remote refresher available.
Project Planning Tools & Calculators
Utilize our suite of interactive engineering tools to accurately size your equipment, estimate project ROI, select the ideal filling method, and calculate precise landed costs for your wine bottling line.
BPH Calculator
Match Annual Production to MSGF Model
Calculateur ROI
Own MSGF Line vs Mobile Bottling Truck
Filling Method Recommendation Quiz
Determine the ideal technology based on your specific wine profile.
Estimateur des coûts débarqués
Calculate estimated final delivery costs to your specific region.
Ready to Specify Your Wine Bottling Line?
Please provide us with your annual case volume, bottle shapes and target markets and we shall come back to you with a configured quotation with landed-cost estimate within 24 hours.



